Okay, so today I decided to dive into the Man City vs. Sevilla FC match and figure out those player ratings everyone’s been buzzing about. It wasn’t super scientific, but I wanted to see what all the fuss was about.
First, I grabbed my laptop and found a reliable stream of the match. I mean, you gotta see the action to even start judging, right? I made sure I had a good view, no buffering or anything annoying like that.
Next, I opened up a simple text document. Nothing fancy, just somewhere to jot down my thoughts. I figured I’d keep it basic: player name, a quick rating out of 10, and maybe a few notes to explain myself.
- Started watching, really paying attention to each player.
- Paused occasionally to write down some observations. Who was making good passes? Who was slacking on defense? That sort of thing.
- Tried to be fair, you know? Not just focus on the goals or big moments.
It was kinda tough, honestly! So much happening on the field, it is very fast-paced.
My Simple Rating System
I went with a pretty straightforward 1-10 scale:
- 1-3: Pretty bad performance.
- 4-6: Meh, okay, nothing special.
- 7-8: Good game, solid contributions.
- 9-10: Amazing, standout performance.
As the match went on, I kept tweaking my ratings. Someone might start strong but then fade, or vice-versa. I realized it’s all pretty subjective, but I tried to be consistent with my little system.
After the final whistle, I looked over my notes and gave each player a final rating. It was interesting to see how my opinions changed throughout the match!
Honestly, it was a fun little experiment. I definitely have a new appreciation for those sports analysts who do this for a living. It’s harder than it looks to keep track of everyone and be objective!
