Okay, so today I’m gonna walk you through my little adventure with RAPIDS and galaxy prediction. Buckle up, it was a bit of a ride!

It all started when I stumbled upon this dataset – massive, you know? Like, really huge. I figured, “Hey, let’s see if RAPIDS can handle this beast and maybe even predict some galaxies!” So, I dove in, headfirst.
First things first, I had to get the data loaded. I used cuDF, the RAPIDS DataFrame library, to read the CSV. It was way faster than Pandas, no joke. We’re talking minutes instead of hours, maybe even seconds in some parts. Seriously sped things up. I then eyeballed the data and selected a few features that seemed important for the prediction.
Next up, cleaning the data. There were some missing values, as always. So, I used cuDF’s fillna function to replace those with the mean of each column. Quick and dirty, but it worked. I also did some basic feature scaling using cuML (RAPIDS’ machine learning library) to scale features between 0 and 1. It kept things stable, you know?
Then came the fun part: building the model. I decided to go with a Random Forest Classifier from cuML. It’s pretty reliable. I split the data into training and testing sets, used cuML’s train_test_split for that and fit the model on the training data. It was surprisingly fast, even with the huge dataset. Like, I barely had time to grab a coffee.
Once the model was trained, I used it to make predictions on the test set. Then, I used cuML’s built-in functions to evaluate the model’s performance. I looked at the accuracy and a few other metrics to see how well it was doing. Honestly, the results were pretty good, better than I expected. Which was great!
But here’s where things got a little tricky. I wanted to visualize the results. Since RAPIDS operates mostly on the GPU, getting the data back to the CPU for plotting with Matplotlib or Seaborn can be a bottleneck. So, I sampled a small subset of the predictions and labels, transferred them to Pandas DataFrames, and then used Seaborn to create a scatter plot. It wasn’t perfect, but it gave me a good idea of how the model was performing.
Throughout the whole process, I kept an eye on GPU memory usage. RAPIDS is awesome, but you can still run out of memory if you’re not careful. I used the rmm library (RAPIDS Memory Manager) to monitor memory usage and make sure I wasn’t pushing things too far. I ended up tweaking the batch sizes and other parameters to optimize memory usage and performance.
- Loading Data: cuDF for reading the CSV.
- Data Cleaning: fillna for missing values, cuML for feature scaling.
- Model Training: cuML Random Forest Classifier.
- Evaluation: cuML metrics.
- Visualization: Sampled data, Pandas, Seaborn.
- Memory Management: rmm for monitoring GPU memory.
Overall, it was a really cool experience. RAPIDS definitely lived up to the hype. It allowed me to process and analyze a huge dataset way faster than I could have with traditional CPU-based tools. Plus, it was fun to learn a new library and see how it could be applied to a real-world problem. It definitely has its quirks, but I can see myself using it a lot more in the future. If you’re dealing with big data and want to speed up your workflow, I highly recommend giving RAPIDS a try. You might be surprised at what you can achieve.
